From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollister-Whitney Co. v. McCallum

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 24, 1947
331 Ill. App. 172 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,532. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 24, 1947 Rehearing denied May 6, 1947 Released for publication May 7, 1947

APPEAL AND ERROR, § 1713conclusiveness of trial court's judgment. In action for declaratory judgment as to plaintiff's liability for commissions on certain business transactions with defendant, judgment for plaintiff would be affirmed on appeal, where testimony was conflicting and there was sufficient evidence to support judgment of trial court, who saw and heard witnesses.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. FRED G. WOLFE, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1947.

Baer, Davis Witherell, for appellant;

Emmons Emmons and Wilson Schmiedeskamp, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 24, 1947; rehearing denied May 6, 1947; released for publication May 7, 1947.


Summaries of

Hollister-Whitney Co. v. McCallum

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 24, 1947
331 Ill. App. 172 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Hollister-Whitney Co. v. McCallum

Case Details

Full title:Hollister-Whitney Company, Appellee, v. W. A. McCallum, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Feb 24, 1947

Citations

331 Ill. App. 172 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
72 N.E.2d 649

Citing Cases

Sankey v. Interstate Dispatch, Inc.

It has frequently been held that we will not review the admissibility of evidence where no objection thereto…