From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-OWW-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-OWW-SMS

08-03-2011

MICHAEL EUGENE HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED

(ECF No. 41.)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST

TO HAVE COVER PAGE OF COMPLAINT

ORIGINALLY FILED IN 1:11-CV-00749

OWW-GSA REPLACED AND DIRECTING

COMPLAINT BE FILED AS A SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS ACTION

(ECF Nos. 46, 45)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO

CLOSE CASE 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA

Plaintiff Michael Eugene Hollis ("Plaintiff") is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by federal actors. On April 1, 2011, an order issued dismissing Plaintiff's first amended complaint and granting him thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 39.) On June 7, 2011, findings and recommendations issued recommending this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 20, 2011, stating that he had mailed several complaints to the court, including a complaint to be filed in this action. (ECF No. 42.) On June 23, 2011, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to notify the Court which of his complaints was to have been the second amended complaint in this action. (ECF No. 44.) On July 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a response stating that case opened as case no. 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA was the complaint that was to be filed in this action and requests the Court to replace the first page of the complaint. (ECF No. 46.) On July 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a revised cover page to the complaint. (ECF No. 45.)

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed June 7, 2011, recommending this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order are VACATED;
2. Plaintiff's request to replace the first page of the complaint is GRANTED and the Clerk's Office is directed to replace the first page of the complaint filed May 10, 2011, in 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA with the revised page filed in this action on July 15, 2011;
3. The complaint filed in 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA shall be filed in this action as a second amended complaint;
4. A copy of this order shall be filed in case no. 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA; and
5. Case 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA shall be closed as a duplicate action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hollis v. York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-OWW-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Hollis v. York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EUGENE HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-OWW-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)