From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-AWI-BAM PC

03-02-2012

MICHAEL EUGENE HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT DAWSON

TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING


THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Michael Eugene Hollis ("Plaintiff") is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by federal actors. On December 7, 2011, Defendant Dawson was served with a summons and copy of the complaint. As of this date, Defendant Dawson has not filed an answer or other responsive pleading. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Dawson shall file an answer to the complaint or other responsive pleading within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hollis v. York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Hollis v. York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EUGENE HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 2, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2012)