From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. Sloan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2009
No. CIV-S-08-2674 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-08-2674 GGH P.

August 17, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed June 17, 2009, plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel was denied. Plaintiff filed two motions for the district judge to reconsider the undersigned's denial of the motion to appoint counsel, on June 26, 2009, and July 13, 2009. However, no district judge has been assigned to this case as plaintiff has not consented or declined to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case.


Summaries of

Hollis v. Sloan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2009
No. CIV-S-08-2674 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Hollis v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, v. PHILLIP SLOAN, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2009

Citations

No. CIV-S-08-2674 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2009)