The parties presented ore tenus testimony. The trial court's findings of fact based on that ore tenus testimony will be sustained unless they are clearly wrong or manifestly unjust.Hollis v. Post, 487 So.2d 872 (Ala. 1986). The defendants contend that Cox failed to establish sole ownership of the property by adverse possession.
Furthermore, her argument regarding delay has long been settled. See Hollis v. Post, 487 So.2d 872 (Ala. 1986). Thus, applying the applicable standard of review in this case, we will "look to see if there is any legal evidence to support the trial court's findings. If such evidence is found, then [we will determine] whether any reasonable view of that evidence supports the trial court's judgment."