Opinion
No. 2:09-cv-3431 FCD KJN P.
December 2, 2010
ORDER
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to re-serve his oppositions on defendants and for the court to find his oppositions timely-filed under the mailbox rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-72, 275 (1988). Plaintiff's oppositions were timely filed and defendants have received plaintiff's oppositions via CM/ECF electronic filing. Therefore, plaintiff is not required to re-serve the oppositions on defendants. Defendants' motions now stand submitted and plaintiff shall file no further documents in connection with these pending motions.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's November 15, 2010 motion is partially granted.
2. Plaintiff's oppositions are deemed timely filed. Plaintiff is not required to reserve the oppositions.
3. Defendants' motions stand submitted. Plaintiff shall file no further documents in connection with these pending motions.
DATED: December 1, 2010