From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2012
No. CIV S-08-1094 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1094 MCE CKD P

02-27-2012

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. J. MASON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 12, 2011, defendants filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed June 30, 2011, denying as untimely defendants' request to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant pursuant to Local Rule 151(b). (ECF No. 107.) Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' July 12, 2011, objections (ECF No. 108), which this Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's June 30, 2011, Order are DENIED.

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hollis v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2012
No. CIV S-08-1094 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Hollis v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. J. MASON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1094 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)