From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 18, 2023
2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC)

12-18-2023

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. J. BAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

ECF NO. 209

RESPONSE DUE JANUARY 2, 2024

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants filed a renewed motion for terminating sanctions, and when plaintiff did not file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, I ordered him to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders. ECF No. 208. Plaintiff now seeks additional time to file a response to the court's order to show cause. ECF No. 209. Plaintiff states that he did mail his opposition, although the docket indicates that the court never received it. Id. at 2. I will grant plaintiff until January 2, 2024, to file both his response to the order to show cause and either an opposition or statement of nonopposition to defendants' motion for terminating sanctions.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 209, is granted.
2. Plaintiff shall file by January 2, 2024, both his response to the court's order to show
cause and either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion for terminating sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hollis v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 18, 2023
2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Hollis v. Bal

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. J. BAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 18, 2023

Citations

2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2023)