From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollins v. Young

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 1, 1994
646 A.2d 1020 (Md. 1994)

Opinion

No. 66, September Term, 1994.

September 1, 1994.

Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals (Circuit Court for Baltimore City); Thomas Ward, Judge.

David A. Carter and Una M. Perez, Baltimore, for petitioner.

David E. Furrer, Baltimore, for respondent.

Before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.


ORDER


The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this first day of September, 1994,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Richwind Joint Venture v. Ernestine Brunson et al., 335 Md. 661, 645 A.2d 1147 (1994). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the respondent.


Summaries of

Hollins v. Young

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 1, 1994
646 A.2d 1020 (Md. 1994)
Case details for

Hollins v. Young

Case Details

Full title:HOLLINS MARKET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. DARLENE YOUNG…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Sep 1, 1994

Citations

646 A.2d 1020 (Md. 1994)
646 A.2d 1020