From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollins v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. C 11-2170 PJH (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-2170 PJH (PR)

11-10-2011

MICHAEL HOLLINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, S. CONROY, and M. MESSNER, Defendants.


ORDER EXTENDING TIME

The court notified plaintiff on the day this civil rights action was filed that he had neither paid the filing fee nor applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed in forma pauperis was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope. Plaintiff has returned the form, but despite the clear instructions on the form to attach a printout of transactions in his inmate account covering the six months prior to filing the complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), he has not done so. He will be afforded one more opportunity to provide a complete IFP application. If he dos not file the necessary printout by November 28, 2011, the case will be dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hollins v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. C 11-2170 PJH (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Hollins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOLLINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-2170 PJH (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)