Hollins v. State

Full title: Casey HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

383 S.W.3d 66 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97556.

2012-10-23

Casey HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael P. David, Judge. Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael P. David, Judge.
Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Casey Hollins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Hollins' request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).