From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOLLINGSWORTH v. MOUNT AIRY

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1924
125 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1924)

Opinion

(Filed 26 November, 1924.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Lyon, J., at April Term, 1924, of SURRY.

J. H. Folger for plaintiff.

E. C. Bivens for defendant.


Civil action to restrain the sale of plaintiff's property for the nonpayment of a street assessment, made and levied against said property for the improvement and paving of a street in the town of Mount Airy.

From a judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order previously entered in the cause, plaintiff appeals.


All the questions presented and raised on this appeal were considered by us and determined against the plaintiff's position in the case of Tarboro v. Forbes, 185 N.C. 59. The judgment must be affirmed on authority of that case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

HOLLINGSWORTH v. MOUNT AIRY

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1924
125 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1924)
Case details for

HOLLINGSWORTH v. MOUNT AIRY

Case Details

Full title:J. C. HOLLINGSWORTH v. TOWN OF MOUNT AIRY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1924

Citations

125 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1924)
125 S.E. 925

Citing Cases

Tarboro v. Forbes

Affirmed. Cited: Gastonia v. Cloninger, 187 N.C. 769; Hollingsworth v. Mount Airy, 188 N.C. 832; Holton v.…

State v. Killian

No error. Cited: S. v. Orr, 175 N.C. 777; S. v. Helms, 181 N.C. 570, 571; S. v. Brinkley, 183 N.C. 722; S. v.…