From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollingsworth v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-503-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-503-TMH

01-31-2013

RICHARD HOLLINGSWORTH, #276 260 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BARRETT, et al., Defendants.


[wo]


FINAL JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, and that this action be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

______________________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hollingsworth v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-503-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Hollingsworth v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HOLLINGSWORTH, #276 260 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BARRETT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-503-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Moran v. Choate

In either case the parties to the agreement, and those claiming under them, are bound by the agreed line.…

Johnson's Adm'r v. Johnson

And in Gardner's Adm'r v. Dale, 309 Ky. 869, 219 S.W.2d 40, we held a husband disqualified to testify…