From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P.

November 1, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

By order filed October 13, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had stated sufficient charging allegations to state cognizable equal protection claims against defendants, and informed plaintiff he could proceed on those claims only or file an amended complaint that also states a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim. The court also informed plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to proceed only as to his equal protection claims as consent to the dismissal of his defective Eighth Amendment claims. Plaintiff has indicated his consent to the dismissal of his defective Eighth Amendment claim.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's defective Eighth Amendment claim is dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: November 1, 2010.


Summaries of

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Holley v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JOEL HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)