From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 3, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0615 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0615 FCD EFB P.

May 3, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 17, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's February 16, 2011 request for a temporary restraining order is denied.

DATED: May 2, 2011.


Summaries of

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 3, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0615 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Holley v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JOEL HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0615 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)