From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P.

January 21, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants' request for an extension of time to file and serve an answer to the complaint, and plaintiff's request for leave to file an amended complaint. Dckt. Nos. 15, 16.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 15(a)(1) provides that "[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within: (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier." Here, defendants have not yet filed a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). Plaintiff therefore, is presently free to file an amended complaint without obtaining leave of court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's January 10, 2011 motion for leave to amend is denied as unnecessary; and

2. Defendants' January 10, 2011 request for an extension of time is granted. Defendants have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer to the complaint.

So ordered.

DATED: January 20, 2011.


Summaries of

Holley v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Holley v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JOEL HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0615 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)