From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 1995
666 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-00758.

December 27, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Dennis P. Maloney, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


This case raises issues identical to those discussed in Snyder v. State, 664 So.2d 1073, 1074 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We decline to reach the constitutionality of the Florida Civil Restitution Lien and Crime Victim's Remedy Act of 1994, sections 960.29 through 960.297, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), because the trial court prepared no separate restitution order, and the record contains no enforceable restitution lien in favor of any specific crime victim. See Snyder, 664 So.2d at 1074; Lund v. State, 658 So.2d 679, 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

We strike the $33 "cost/fine" and the $2 discretionary cost for the reasons explained in Snyder. However, we affirm Holley's $300 public defender fee, imposed pursuant to section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1993), because she agreed to pay this fee as part of her plea agreement.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 1995
666 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Holley v. State

Case Details

Full title:LACRETIA ANNE HOLLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 27, 1995

Citations

666 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Coradi v. State

The $10,000.00 referred to in the plea agreement does not constitute a restitution lien unless a separate…