From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. Phila. Dist. Attorney's Office

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
32 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

32 EM 2024

09-25-2024

MICHAEL HOLLEY, Petitioner v. PHILA. DIST. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Holley v. Phila. Dist. Attorney's Office

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
32 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Holley v. Phila. Dist. Attorney's Office

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOLLEY, Petitioner v. PHILA. DIST. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

32 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)