Opinion
2:22-cv-01667-RFB-EJY
10-25-2022
DIONNE HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. CLARITY SERVICES, INC; CNU ONLINE HOLDINS, LLC; DATAX, LTD, Defendants.
Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552 NAYLOR & BRASTER, Cheryl O'Connor Nevada Bar No. 14745 JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.
Complaint Filed: 10/04/22
Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552 NAYLOR & BRASTER, Cheryl O'Connor Nevada Bar No. 14745 JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.
DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. AND PLAINTIFF'S JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLARITY TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (“Clarity”) and Plaintiff Dionne Holley (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this joint motion to extend the time for Clarity to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) pursuant to LR IA 6-1.
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on October 4, 2022, and currently, Clarity's responsive pleading is due November 2, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) The first extension will allow Clarity an opportunity to investigate the facts of this case and to avoid the incurrence of additional attorneys' fees when this matter may be resolved shortly. Plaintiff and Clarity submit this joint motion and agree that Clarity shall have an extension until December 2, 2022, to file its responsive pleading.
This is Clarity's first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice any party, but to permit both Plaintiff and Clarity an opportunity to more fully investigate the claims alleged.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.