From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holley v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 22, 2007
No. 2:04-cv-2006-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-2006-MCE-EFB-P.

March 22, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 23, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case.

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's June 22, 2006, motion for summary judgment is denied;

3. Defendants' August 21, 2006, motion for summary judgment is granted and that judgment be entered in their favor; and

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Holley v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 22, 2007
No. 2:04-cv-2006-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Holley v. California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK RONALD HOLLEY, Sr. Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 22, 2007

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-2006-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2007)

Citing Cases

Quezada v. Gricewich

As a final argument, Plaintiff contends that he complained of Defendant Gricewich's conflict of interest and…