From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollander v. Donovan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Nov 18, 2009
No. 08-CV-4045 (FB) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-CV-4045 (FB) (LB).

November 18, 2009

For the Plaintiff: ROY DEN HOLLANDER, ESQ., pro se, New York, NY.

For the Defendant Deborah Swindells Donovan:, JOSHUA S. HURWIT, ESQ., GORDON REES LLP, New York, NY.

For the Defendant Paul W. Steinberg:, PAUL W. STEINBERG, ESQ., pro se, New York, NY.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The Court hereby informs the parties that it intends to treat defendants' motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The parties shall submit to the Court all pertinent materials by December 18, 2009, including materials addressing whether the defendants' use of plaintiff's works is protected under the fair use doctrine. See NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute, 364 F.3d 471, 476 (2d Cir. 2004) (discussing statutory defense of fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107).

Defendants shall notify plaintiff of Court's determination pursuant to Local Rule 12.1.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hollander v. Donovan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Nov 18, 2009
No. 08-CV-4045 (FB) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Hollander v. Donovan

Case Details

Full title:ROY DEN HOLLANDER, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH SWINDELLS DONOVAN, PAUL W…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Nov 18, 2009

Citations

No. 08-CV-4045 (FB) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2009)