Opinion
1:02CV395
March 16, 2004
ORDER
Upon Motion and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that footnote 4 contained in page 7 of the Judgment entered in this matter on January 22, 2004 be and is hereby amended to read as follows:
The Court notes that the facts contained in the Wehrman holding are inapplicable to the case at bench. In Wehrman, the plaintiff did consult with an attorney, but the consultation regarded another completely unrelated legal matter, rather than the Plaintiffs potential FTCA medical malpractice claim against the VA. 830 F.2d at 1486. The case does not provide any support for the proposition that a plaintiffs consultation with a lawyer regarding a potential FTCA malpractice claim does not terminate the continuous course of treatment.