From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 16, 2004
1:02CV395 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004)

Opinion

1:02CV395

March 16, 2004


ORDER


Upon Motion and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that footnote 4 contained in page 7 of the Judgment entered in this matter on January 22, 2004 be and is hereby amended to read as follows:

The Court notes that the facts contained in the Wehrman holding are inapplicable to the case at bench. In Wehrman, the plaintiff did consult with an attorney, but the consultation regarded another completely unrelated legal matter, rather than the Plaintiffs potential FTCA medical malpractice claim against the VA. 830 F.2d at 1486. The case does not provide any support for the proposition that a plaintiffs consultation with a lawyer regarding a potential FTCA malpractice claim does not terminate the continuous course of treatment.


Summaries of

Holland v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 16, 2004
1:02CV395 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Holland v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:TRACY DONELL HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 16, 2004

Citations

1:02CV395 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004)