From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 11, 2016
191 So. 3d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D16–253.

05-11-2016

Jason HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jason Holland, Sneads, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Jason Holland, Sneads, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Holland appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was treated as a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error in the trial court's denial of the petition as untimely and impermissibly successive. However, the court's order mistakenly refers to a previous rule 3.850 motion filed in February 2013 instead of this habeas petition filed in April 2015. On remand, the trial court is instructed to amend its order to refer to the correct pleading.

Affirmed and Remanded with instructions.

STEVENSON, GROSS and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holland v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 11, 2016
191 So. 3d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Holland v. State

Case Details

Full title:JASON HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 11, 2016

Citations

191 So. 3d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)