Holland v. State

Full title: EARL HOLLAND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Dec 22, 1998

982 S.W.2d 789 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. ED 73809.

OPINION FILED: December 22, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE STEVEN H. GOLDMAN, JUDGE.

Paul Yarns, 1320 Market Street, Room 235, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, John M. Morris, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before: Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, J., and Mary Rhodes Russell, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Earl Holland (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On a previous appeal in this case, this Court remanded for an evidentiary hearing.Holland v. State, 954 S.W.2d 660 (Mo. App. 1997). Following the hearing, the court issued a judgment denying Movant's motion, specifically finding Movant's testimony to not be credible.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).