From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1986
484 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2583.

January 15, 1986. Rehearing Denied March 6, 1986.

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Phillip Dyland Holland, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Mr. Holland's motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Holland appeals, contending that he was entitled to a hearing under authority of Morgan v. State, 475 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1985). Facially, Holland is correct. However our review leaves us convinced that the error was harmless according to applicable criteria and that no purpose would be served by remanding for a hearing. Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1981) and Recinos v. State, 420 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See also Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1984).

Affirmed.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1986
484 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Holland v. State

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP DYLAND HOLLAND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 6, 1986

Citations

484 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Holland v. State

BARKETT, Judge. We have for review Holland v. State, 484 So.2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), which conflicts with…