From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 22, 2006
Nos. 09-06-381 CR, 09-06-382 CR, 09-06-383 CR, 09-06-384 CR, 09-06-385 CR, 09-06-386 CR (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 09-06-381 CR, 09-06-382 CR, 09-06-383 CR, 09-06-384 CR, 09-06-385 CR, 09-06-386 CR

Opinion Delivered November 22, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause Nos. 89821, 91160, 91297, 92581, 92582, and 92583. Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On September 28, 2006, we informed the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant's response does not establish our jurisdiction. The notices of appeal seek to appeal the "State's failure to dismiss causes and denial of speedy trial," but according to the trial court clerk the appellant has not been convicted or sentenced in cause nos. 89821, 91160, 91297, 92581, 92582, and 92583. The issue raised by appellant is not appealable at this time. See Smith v. Gohmert, 962 S.W.2d 590, 592-93 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Holland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 22, 2006
Nos. 09-06-381 CR, 09-06-382 CR, 09-06-383 CR, 09-06-384 CR, 09-06-385 CR, 09-06-386 CR (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Holland v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD CHARLES HOLLAND, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Nov 22, 2006

Citations

Nos. 09-06-381 CR, 09-06-382 CR, 09-06-383 CR, 09-06-384 CR, 09-06-385 CR, 09-06-386 CR (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2006)