From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Goldco, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 26, 1989
549 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2623.

September 21, 1989. Rehearing Denied October 26, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County; Clyde Wells, Judge.

Kerrigan, Estess Rankin, Pensacola, Joel S. Perwin of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin Perwin, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Richard M. Denney, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.


Appellants, the plaintiffs in a personal injury suit arising out of a slip and fall accident, appeal an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse the final summary judgment on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether appellee provided adequate warning to the plaintiff, Luie Holland, to apprise him of the wet condition of the restaurant floor. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 351 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1977).

REVERSED.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holland v. Goldco, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 26, 1989
549 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Holland v. Goldco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LUIE HOLLAND AND JOANN HOLLAND, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. GOLDCO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 26, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)