From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. City of New York

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 16, 2011
422 F. App'x 18 (2d Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-1842-cv.

May 16, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mauskopf, J.). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Michael P. Joseph, of Counsel, Kliegerman Joseph, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant New York City Sheriff Andre Jackson.

Sharyn Michele Rootenberg, of Counsel (Larry A. Sonnenshein, of Counsel, on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees City of New York, Office of the Sheriff of the City of New York.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, GUIDO CALABRESI, and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.



SUMMARY ORDER

Sheriff Andre Jackson appeals the district court's March 30, 2010 order granting the municipal parties' motion for summary judgment on his cross-claim for reimbursement and indemnification of attorney's fees incurred litigating a civil action in which both the City and Jackson were defendants. He also appeals the district court's order denying his motion for summary judgment on the same claim.

After reviewing the issues on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons articulated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned order and opinion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Holland v. City of New York

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 16, 2011
422 F. App'x 18 (2d Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Holland v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Aleah HOLLAND, Robert J. Musso as the Trustee of the Estate to the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

422 F. App'x 18 (2d Cir. 2011)