From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Brown McFarland

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Oct 17, 1912
152 S.W. 1195 (Tex. Civ. App. 1912)

Opinion

September 11, 1912. Rehearing Denied October 17, 1912.

Appeal from Smith County Court; Jesse F. Odom, Judge.

Action by Mrs. C. E. Holland against Brown McFarland. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Motion to affirm on certificate. Refused.

Lasseter McIlwaine, of Tyler, for appellant. Fitzgerald, Butler Bulloch, of Tyler, for appellee.


This is a motion to affirm on certificate under the provisions of article 1016 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1895. The certificate of the clerk shows that the appeal bond was filed in the court below on January 29, 1912. The motion to affirm, together with the certificate of the clerk, was filed with the clerk of this court September 11, 1912. The appeal, which was perfected in the court below, was returnable to the last term of this court, which expired on the first Monday in July. The motion to affirm therefore comes too late. The following authorities sufficiently state the grounds: Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S.W. 259; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Wofford, 32 Tex.Cr.R. 427, 72 S.W. 620, 74 S.W. 943; Pickett v. Mead, 25 S.W. 654; Berry v. Blankenship, 30 Tex. 380.

The motion to affirm is refused.


Summaries of

Holland v. Brown McFarland

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Oct 17, 1912
152 S.W. 1195 (Tex. Civ. App. 1912)
Case details for

Holland v. Brown McFarland

Case Details

Full title:HOLLAND v. BROWN McFARLAND

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: Oct 17, 1912

Citations

152 S.W. 1195 (Tex. Civ. App. 1912)

Citing Cases

Herndon v. Ridley

The appeal in this case was clearly returnable at the preceding term of this court, and the motion therefor…

Fontana v. T. S. Reed Grocery Co.

"This matter is controlled by the decision in the case of Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S.W. 259, by…