From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holder v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 26, 1968
162 S.E.2d 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43684.

ARGUED JUNE 4, 1968.

DECIDED JUNE 26, 1968. REHEARING DENIED JULY 17, 1968.

Larceny of automobile. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Boykin, Emeritus.

Russo Russo, Lucio L. Russo, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, Solicitor General, J. Walter LeCraw, for appellee.


The appellant was tried and convicted of larceny of an automobile. He contends that there was a material variance between the allegata and probata in that the indictment alleged that the automobile was the property of Lee McKenzie whereas the evidence disclosed that legal title to the vehicle was held by another person. While it is true that the record shows that Lee McKenzie was not the holder of the legal title to the automobile, there was evidence that he was in lawful possession of the vehicle at the time it was stolen. Proof that certain property alleged to have been stolen was taken from the lawful possession of the person named in the indictment as the owner is sufficient proof of ownership although the legal title to the property be in another. Thomas v. State, 27 Ga. App. 38 (2) ( 107 S.E. 418).

The appellant's contention is without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

ARGUED JUNE 4, 1968 — DECIDED JUNE 26, 1968 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 17, 1968.


Summaries of

Holder v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 26, 1968
162 S.E.2d 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Holder v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOLDER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 26, 1968

Citations

162 S.E.2d 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
162 S.E.2d 792

Citing Cases

Mahfouz v. State

The rule permitting the ownership of property set out in a larceny indictment to be alleged as the property…