To the extent that Plaintiff seeks to raise more than one constitutional violation pursuant to section 1983 (i.e., a substantive due process violation and a procedural due process violation), it is directed to include each alleged constitutional violation in a separate count, with the requisite supporting factual allegations in the Third Amended Complaint. SeeArenal v. City of Punta Gorda, Fla., 932 F. Supp. 1406, 1413 (M.D. Fla. 1996) (noting that substantive and procedural due process are distinct causes of action); Arroyo v Judd, 8:10-cv-911-T-23TBM, 2010 WL 2465173 (M.D. Fla. June 15, 2010); Holder v. Gualtieri, 8:14-cv-3052-T-33TGW, 2015 WL 1880782, *6-7 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 24, 2015) (citing Vinyard v. Wilson, 311 F.3d 1340, 1356 (11th Cir. 2002) (distinguishing substantive and procedural due process claims). The Court will otherwise deny Defendants' merits arguments without prejudice, with leave to refile a similar motion, if appropriate, after the Third Amended Complaint is filed.