From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holden v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
1:11-cv-00716-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-00716-SMS Doc. 9

08-31-2011

BENJAMIN HOLDEN and RASHEEDA HOLDEN, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

FORWARD SERVICE DOCUMENTS

TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL

FOR SERVICE

Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff's application for benefits. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 302(c)(15).

On May 6, 2011, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted (Doc. 5). On July 5, 2011, the Court ordered that new case documents be issued and sent to plaintiffs for completion and return to the court (Doc. 7). On July 28, 2011, plaintiffs returned the completed notice of submission of documents form and appropriate copies to the court.

Therefore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to forward the notice of submission of documents form (Doc. 9), together with the appropriate copies, to the United States Marshal in Sacramento, CA, to effect service upon defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Holden v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
1:11-cv-00716-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Holden v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN HOLDEN and RASHEEDA HOLDEN, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-00716-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)