From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holcomb v. Union Confectionery Mach. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 3, 1952
280 AD 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion


280 A.D. 252 113 N.Y.S.2d 32 WILLIAM H. HOLCOMB, Doing Business under the Name of JACKSONVILLE CANDY COMPANY, Appellant, v. UNION CONFECTIONERY MACHINERY CO., INC., Respondent. Supreme Court of New York, First Department. June 3, 1952

         APPEAL from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (GREENBERG, J.), entered December 14, 1951, in New York County, which granted, in part, a motion by defendant for an examination of plaintiff before trial.

         COUNSEL

          Paul A. Crouch of counsel (Clark, Carrs&sEllis, attorneys), for appellant.

          Theodore B. Wolf of counsel (Sherwin A. Rodin with him on the brief; Zelkins&sCohen, attorneys), for respondent.

          Per Curiam.

          Plaintiff buyer has already furnished defendant seller a detailed bill of particulars substantially giving defendant all the information sought by the examination before trial granted by the order appealed from except possibly as to items 5 and 7 in defendant's notice of motion for plaintiff's examination. On this record, in our opinion, it is onerous and presently unnecessary to compel plaintiff to travel round trip across half the continent for this examination before trial.

          The order appealed from should be modified to permit defendant to examine plaintiff when plaintiff comes to New York for the trial but only as to items 5 and 7 at a time and place to be specified in the order to be entered herein; or if plaintiff comes to New York prior thereto, defendant should be advised and given opportunity of then conducting the examination herein directed. As so modified the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant.          Defendant, if so advised, may now move, however, for examination of plaintiff by written interrogatories at plaintiff's place of business in Texas. Settle order.

         PECK, P. J., DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

         Order unanimously modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. Settle order on notice.

Summaries of

Holcomb v. Union Confectionery Mach. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 3, 1952
280 AD 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Holcomb v. Union Confectionery Mach. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. HOLCOMB, Doing Business under the Name of JACKSONVILLE CANDY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1952

Citations

280 AD 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
280 App. Div. 252
113 N.Y.S.2d 32

Citing Cases

McGinty v. Roxbury Ski Center, Incorporated

On this record, we are of the opinion that it is onerous and presently unnecessary to compel the infant…

Lowenberg v. Stafford

Some of the advantages of the reform of the law in that regard (see Parker v. Burgoyne, 167 Misc. 542,…