From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holbach v. North Dakota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-38 (D.N.D. Jan. 24, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-38

01-24-2014

Mitchell David Holbach, Plaintiff, v. State of North Dakota, County of Ward, City of Minot, Wayne Stenehjem, Roza Larson, and John [Last Name Illegible], Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

On December 30, 2013, the Court received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending that Mitchell David Holbach's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and his case dismissed without prejudice to reopening upon payment of the filing fee (Doc. #9). Holbach did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation along with the entire file and finds the magistrate judge's analysis is correct. The Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons stated therein, Holbach's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2) is DENIED. This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice to reopening upon the payment of the filing fee.

The Court certifies that any appeal would be frivolous, could not be taken in good faith, and may not be taken in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Holbach v. North Dakota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-38 (D.N.D. Jan. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Holbach v. North Dakota

Case Details

Full title:Mitchell David Holbach, Plaintiff, v. State of North Dakota, County of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-38 (D.N.D. Jan. 24, 2014)

Citing Cases

Lightfeather v. Lancaster Cnty. Courts

The forced administration of medication, on its own, does not necessarily create an imminent danger of…

Lightfeather v. Amy

See Filing No. 15 at 1 (injection first ordered by Stinson in May 2020); Lightfeather v. Woods, 2023 WL…