January, 1921.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Order modified by striking out the provision allowing defendant to file an amended answer, and as so modified affirmed without costs, on the ground that the notice of motion contained no request for such relief, and no proposed amended answer was attached to the motion papers.
Full title:HOISTING MACHINERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. ELDERFIELDS RESERVATION, INC.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1921
The Appellate Term, First Department, has held that such a request must be predicated upon an additional…
Lebron v. St. Vincent Med. Ctr.Since the court must examine the proposed pleading for patent sufficiency, it is axiomatic that the proposed…