From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hohauser v. S. S. Development Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December, 1932.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. We are of the opinion that plaintiff was obligated to prepare both preliminary plans and specifications and final working drawings and specifications for the sum of $2,500, payment for which was contingent upon removal of the restrictions by the board of standards and appeals within a reasonable time. Such restrictions were so removed within a reasonable time. Findings of fact inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings to support this decision will be made.


Summaries of

Hohauser v. S. S. Development Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Hohauser v. S. S. Development Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY HOHAUSER, Respondent, v. S. S. DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., and BROADWAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Matter of Bralus Corporation v. Berger

( Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Brooklyn Heights Realty Co., 111 App. Div. 358; Spannhake, Inc., v. Mountain…