From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogue v. Hogue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1996
225 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 25, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mellan, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff wife and the defendant husband were married for approximately 20 years, during which time the defendant was employed as a medical doctor and the plaintiff worked only sporadically. At the time the divorce was granted, the plaintiff was approximately 46 years old, in good health, and well educated, but had little marketable work experience. Given these factors, we agree with the court's finding that the plaintiff is capable of becoming self-supporting, but is not yet readily employable ( see, Sperling v Sperling, 165 A.D.2d 338). We further find that the duration and amount of maintenance were proper ( see, Sperling v Sperling, supra; Reingold v Reingold, 143 A.D.2d 126).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly reviewable on appeal ( see, CPLR 5501 [a]). Miller, J.P., Joy, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hogue v. Hogue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1996
225 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Hogue v. Hogue

Case Details

Full title:ABIDA HOGUE, Respondent, v. MOHAMMED HOGUE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 198

Citing Cases

MICA v. MICA

Here, however, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion when it awarded maintenance to the…

L'Esperance v. L'Esperance

The husband further contends that the court improperly awarded the wife 40% of the value of his interest in…