From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogge v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2012
469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7340

03-13-2012

THOMAS K. HOGGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARVARD STEPHENS, Dr., Chief Physician, Office of Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity; MANICKAVASAGER, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician (Past), Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; LINDA ROBB, Phlebotomist (Lab Technician), Powhatan Medical Unit (Receiving), sued individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLINGS, Director of Prison Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and KEITH DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; BENITA BADGETTE, Healthcare Adm., Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; HOFFMAN, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; AMONETTE, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician, Powhatan Receiving Unit, sued individually and in official capacity; MARY JOHNSON, Registered Nurse, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLING, Defendants.

Thomas K. Hogge, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00582-JRS)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas K. Hogge, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Kevin Hogge appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hogge v. Stephens, No. 3:09-cv-00582-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2010; June 1, Sept. 6 & 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hogge v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2012
469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Hogge v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS K. HOGGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARVARD STEPHENS, Dr., Chief…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)