Hogge v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Full title: EVERETT HOGGE AND PRISCILLA HOGGE, Plaintiff, v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 7, 2007

C07-02873 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2007)

Opinion

EVERETT HOGGE AND PRISCILLA HOGGE, Plaintiff, v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, Defendant. No. C07-02873 MJJ United States District Court, N.D. California. June 7, 2007

          ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING OF MOTION FOR REMAND

          MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.

         Before the Court is Plaintiffs Everett Hogge and Priscilla Hogge's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Order Shortening Time For Briefing Schedule and Hearing of Motion to Remand.¹ Also before the Court is Plaintiffs' Request for Intervention of the General Duty Judge.² Upon good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Shortening Time for Briefing Schedule and Hearing of Motion to Remand. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Request for Intervention of the General Duty Judge.

1 Docket No. 17.

2 Docket No. 18.

         Defendant John Crane Inc.'s ("Defendant") Opposition brief, if any, shall be filed not later than 11:00 a.m. on June 8, 2007, and shall not exceed ten pages in length. Plaintiffs' Reply brief, in any, shall be filed not later than 3:00 p.m. on June 8, 2007, and shall not exceed five pages in length.

         The Court will deem the matter submitted on the papers and will set the matter for a hearing only if necessary.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.