From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoggard v. Page

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 7, 2018
No. 17-2525 (8th Cir. May. 7, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2525

05-07-2018

Nathan Hoggard Plaintiff - Appellant Jerry Williams Plaintiff v. Roger Page, Individually and as Registered Agent and as Member and Owner of Arabi Cattle Company other Arabi Cattle Company; Jim Franklin, Individually and as Employee of Arabi Cattle Company; Arabi Cattle Company LLC, Limited Liability Company Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro [Unpublished] Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action involving a negligence claim, Nathan Hoggard appeals from the order of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. After de novo review, we agree with the District Court's determination that defendants did not owe or assume a duty of care giving rise to liability for the injuries Hoggard sustained during a hay-loading accident. We affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. --------


Summaries of

Hoggard v. Page

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 7, 2018
No. 17-2525 (8th Cir. May. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Hoggard v. Page

Case Details

Full title:Nathan Hoggard Plaintiff - Appellant Jerry Williams Plaintiff v. Roger…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 7, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2525 (8th Cir. May. 7, 2018)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Powers

Most courts to consider the issue have found that the FMCSR does not create a private right of action. See,…