From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Vandewater

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 3, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

218 18–01893

05-03-2019

Mark HOGAN and Elizabeth Hogan, Individually, and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Jack A. Hogan, an Infant, and Ithaca G. Hogan, an Infant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David VANDEWATER, Frank P. Rose, Defendants, and Gina Nicoletti, Defendant–Respondent. (Appeal No. 3.)

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS. BARCLAY DAMON LLP, ROCHESTER (KELSEY TILL THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.


BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS.

BARCLAY DAMON LLP, ROCHESTER (KELSEY TILL THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hogan v. Vandewater (appeal No. 1), ––– A.D.3d ––––, 97 N.Y.S.3d 899 (May 3, 2019) (4th Dept. 2019).


Summaries of

Hogan v. Vandewater

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 3, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hogan v. Vandewater

Case Details

Full title:Mark HOGAN and Elizabeth Hogan, Individually, and as Parents and Natural…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: May 3, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 1894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
172 A.D.3d 1894