Hogan v. Vandewater

Full title: MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: May 3, 2019

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

219 CA 18-01894

05-03-2019

MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF JACK A. HOGAN, AN INFANT, AND ITHACA G. HOGAN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DAVID VANDEWATER AND GINA NICOLETTI, DEFENDANTS, AND FRANK P. ROSE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. SLYE LAW OFFICES, P.C., WATERTOWN (ROBERT J. SLYE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

PRESENT:

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

SLYE LAW OFFICES, P.C., WATERTOWN (ROBERT J. SLYE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered May 5, 2017. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Frank P. Rose.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hogan v Vandewater ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 3, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: May 3, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court