From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Vandewater

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
May 3, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3485 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

218 CA 18-01893

05-03-2019

MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF JACK A. HOGAN, AN INFANT, AND ITHACA G. HOGAN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DAVID VANDEWATER, FRANK P. ROSE, DEFENDANTS, AND GINA NICOLETTI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. BARCLAY DAMON LLP, ROCHESTER (KELSEY TILL THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


PRESENT:

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

BARCLAY DAMON LLP, ROCHESTER (KELSEY TILL THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered May 5, 2017. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Gina Nicoletti.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hogan v Vandewater ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 3, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: May 3, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Hogan v. Vandewater

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
May 3, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3485 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hogan v. Vandewater

Case Details

Full title:MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: May 3, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3485 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)