From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Leblanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-495-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-495-JJB-SCR

01-24-2012

ELLIOT HOGAN (#106177) v. JAMES LEBLANC, ETAL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated November 16, 2011 (doc. no. 51). The plaintiff filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED. Further, the claims against defendant C. Jackson and the unidentified John Doe doctors are DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 24 day of January, 2012.

______________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Hogan v. Leblanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-495-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Hogan v. Leblanc

Case Details

Full title:ELLIOT HOGAN (#106177) v. JAMES LEBLANC, ETAL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-495-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)