Hogan v. Hamlett

Full title: BRIAN HOGAN, Petitioner, v. JIM HAMLETT, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 29, 2007

No. CIV S-03-2660 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2660 LKK JFM P.

March 29, 2007

ORDER

LAWRENCE KARLTON, Senior District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. After receiving two extensions of time, petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 11, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.