From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Danforth

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 30, 2016
187 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–4497.

03-30-2016

Katherine D. HOGAN, Appellant, v. Jaye L. DANFORTH, Appellee.

Emilian “Ian” Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant. D. Christine Thurman and Rachel Hill Borntreger of Thurmand Law Firm PLLC, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Emilian “Ian” Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

D. Christine Thurman and Rachel Hill Borntreger of Thurmand Law Firm PLLC, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hogan v. Danforth

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 30, 2016
187 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Hogan v. Danforth

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE D. HOGAN, Appellant, v. JAYE L. DANFORTH, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

187 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
2016 WL 1241547