From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 2009
18 So. 3d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5D08-2896.

September 4, 2009. Rehearing Denied October 9, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Donna L. McIntosh, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Gonzalez v. State, 948 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that non-testifying defendant who brings out his or her own exculpatory statements through another witness runs risk of having statements impeached by felony convictions); see also 5 Jack B. Weinstein Margaret A. Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 806.04(2)(b) (Joseph M. McLaughlin ed., 2d ed. 2002) ("A defendant who chooses not to testify but who succeeds in getting his . . . own exculpatory statements into evidence runs the risk of having those statements impeached by felony convictions.").

PALMER, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 2009
18 So. 3d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Hoffman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Russel Jay HOFFMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 9, 2009

Citations

18 So. 3d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)