From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1964
163 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 4378.

May 8, 1964.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County, Richard H. Cooper, J.

Joseph X. DuMond, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


Earl Frank Hoffman appeals an order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. Appellant's motion failed to allege that he was indigent and unable to employ counsel at the time he entered his plea. The motion therefore was legally insufficient. See Dias v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 158 So.2d 766; Savage v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 156 So.2d 566; Auflick v. State, Fla. App. 1963, 158 So.2d 767; Duke v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 549.

The order appealed is therefore affirmed without prejudice to appellant's right to refile his motion in accordance with the rule announced in Turner v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 11.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C.J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1964
163 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Hoffman v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARL FRANK HOFFMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 8, 1964

Citations

163 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Tillman v. State

The motion was therefore legally insufficient. Hoffman v. State, 163 So.2d 797 (D.C.A.Fla. 1964), and cases…