From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 15, 2010
Case No. 3:04-cv-217-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-cv-217-KRG-KAP.

July 15, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, docket no. 20, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on July 2, 2009, docket no. 21, recommending that the petitioner's motion be denied.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed timely objections, docket no. 22, which are meritless.

After de novo review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2010, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, docket no. 20, is denied.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 15, 2010
Case No. 3:04-cv-217-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:DARIN WARD HOFFMAN, Petitioner v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, SUPERINTENDENT, S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:04-cv-217-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2010)