From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 28, 1940
259 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

May 28, 1940.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.


By the same order the actions were consolidated but no appeal is taken from the ruling. In each action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the death of his intestate which occurred on January 21, 1940, when an automobile in which decedents were riding collided with one of defendant's trains at a grade crossing in Rensselaer county. Defendant enumerates ten witnesses whose convenience it asserts will be promoted by a change of venue. The witnesses, with one exception, a photographer, are employees of defendant, and five of them are non-residents of this State. Two of plaintiff's proposed witnesses, an engineer and a photographer, are residents of the county of Saratoga. The convenience of none of the witnesses on either side need be considered on this appeal. The order appealed from is discretionary. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 28, 1940
259 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. HOFFMAN, as Administrator, etc., of ELLEN MARY HOFFMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 28, 1940

Citations

259 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Taller Cooper, Inc. v. Rand

In furtherance of its claim that the convenience of material witnesses requires that the case be tried in…